In this article you will have a comprehensive note on Role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in insurance business in India.
1. INTRODUCTION:
India is the most
attractive foreign direct Investment
destination in the world. Due to the growing demand for insurance, more and
more insurance companies are now emerging in the Indian insurance sector. In
fact FDI provides a win to win situation for the host country and the home country.
Both countries are directly interested in inviting FDI, because they benefit a
lot from such type of investment. Owing to the steady and fast growing Indian
economy, India has become one of the
most famous destinations for foreign direct investment. The rapid growth is all the business sectors in India is
reciprocated by liberal trade policies, development in telecommunication and
technology, expansion of markets and low restrictions from FDI. India now
becomes the second most wanted FDI destination in the world. Indian insurance
sector, especially general insurance sector is totally dominated by the
government owned insurance company. With the increased percentage of FDI,
various private insurance companies are likely
to benefit the most.
As
per the current FDI norms, foreign participation in an Indian insurance company
is restricted to 26.0% of its equity / ordinary
share capital. The Insurance Regulator
has stipulated that foreign investment in Indian
Insurance companies be limited to 26% of total equity issued (FDI limit) with
the balance being funded by Indian promoter entities. The limit to foreign
investment includes both direct and indirect investment and has been a cause of
significant lobbying by foreign insurance companies for a change in regulations
to increase the FDI limit to 49% of equity
issued. For political parties such as Trinamool Congress who think that
insurance is evil and equate it to all the ills that abounds the health-care of
the west, it helps to remember that insurance in India has a deep-rooted
history. Insurance in various forms has been mentioned in the writings of Manu (Manusmrithi), Yagnavalkya (Dharmashastra) and Kautilya (Arthashastra). The essential
context of the historical reference to insurance in these ancient Indian texts
is the same i.e. pooling of resources that could be re-distributed in times of
calamities such as fire, floods, epidemics and famine.
FDI
in insurance sector currently stands at around Rs2500 crore and we can expect
it to approximately double now that the FDI cap is slated to rise by another 23
percent to 49 percent. Larger FDI would bring in better insurance education,
superior product innovation and greater awareness efforts by insurance
companies. For a country like India, an oligopolistic insurance sector with a
large participation by domestic companies isn’t necessarily a good idea. There
is phenomenal potential in the insurance sector and unfortunately because of
the nature of the business, large capital investments are required and will be
needed in future too to build scale in a
large country like ours. The insurance sector for long has suffered from muted
growth and needs a major breather in the form of higher
FDI. The hike in FDI cap would spell good news for the
common man as this would eventually lead to a decrease in insurance premium
because of enhanced efficiency and innovation in the sector
The
insurance sector is of considerable importance to every developing economy; it
inculcates the savings habit, which
in turn generates long-term investible funds for infrastructure building There
is hardly a facet of the Indian psyche that the concept of ‘foreign’ has not
permeated. This term, connoting modernization, international brands and acquisitions
by MNCs in popular imagination, has acquired renewed significance after the
reforms initiated by the Indian Government in 1991 (Mishra & Bhatnagar,
2009). As per guidelines issues by the Government of India the insurance sector also opened for foreign investors.
And Indian insurance companies can issue equity shares, fully, compulsorily and
mandatorily convertible debentures and fully, compulsorily and mandatorily
convertible preference shares subject to pricing guidelines/valuation norms
prescribed under FEMA Regulations for foreign direct investment in Indian
insurance companies (FDI Circular, 2012). According to this policy Applications
for foreign direct investment in insurance sector addressed to the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) in order to ensure that the 26 per
cent limit of foreign shareholding applicable for the insurance sector.
2.
CONCEPT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI) IN INDIAN INSURANCE BUSINESS POLICY:
Foreign
Direct Investment is the process whereby a resident of one country acquires the
ownership of assets for the purpose of controlling production, distribution
other activities of a firm in another country.
A
foreign direct investment (F.D.I) is an investment made by a company in one
country, into a company in another country. It refers to an investment made to
acquire lasting or long-term interest in company or entity based operating
outside of the economy of the investor. The investment is direct because the investor, which could
be a foreign person, company or group of entities, is seeking to control,
manage, or have significant influence over the foreign enterprise. FDI is a
major source of external finance which means that countries with limited
amounts of capital can receive finance beyond national borders from wealthier
countries.
Foreign Direct
Investment can be divided
into two;
a.
Greenfield Foreign
Direct Investment.
b.
Brownfield Foreign
Investment.
As per the provision of Rule-2(f) of Indian Insurance Companies (Foreign Investment) Rules, 2015, “Foreign Direct Investment” (FDI) means and includes investment by non-resident or
persons
resident outside India and other eligible entities in the equity shares of an
Indian Insurance Company under clause(i) of sub-regulation (1) of Regulation-5 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of
Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 (hereinafter
referred to as FEMA Regulations, 2000:
Provided
that for the purpose of these rules, Foreign Direct Investment shall include
investment by Foreign Venture Capital Investors (FVCI) is permissible, under Regulation
6 of FEMA Regulations, 2000.
3. ORIGIN OF FDI IN INDIA:
The
origin of FDI in India can traced back to 1500 A.D. the Portuguese Set up their
unit in by the British East India
Company in 1600 A.D. and Dutch East India Company in 1602 A.D. They came to our
country as merchants and later turned industrialists and some of them became
rulers. Fierce competition followed between these merchants and
industrialists from these countries
till 1800 A.D. Finally, British East India Company emerged successful and colonized India. Political subordination of was the protection for the British and MNCs’
markets from Japanese competition.
The
entry of FDI into India on a commercial scale began in 1875 with initial
investments in the field mining, tea
plantation, railways, insurance,
generation and distribution of electricity and wholesale and retail trade.
4.
EVOLUTION OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI) POLICY IN INDIA:
4.1.
Foreign Direct Investment after Independence:
Up
to August 1947, the policy of Government of
India was one of permitting unconditional and unrestricted inflow
of foreign capital due to political dependency. After Independence the Government of
India's policy with regard to foreign capital was formulated, for the first time, in the Industrial Policy Resolution of 6 April 1948.
The Government recognized the participation of foreign capital and enterprise, particularly as
regards to industrial technique and knowledge for rapid industrialization of
the economy.
4.2.
DIFFERENT PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AFTER INDEPENDENCE:
A.PHASE ONE ; PHASE
OF CAUTIOUS WELCOME
(1948-1968):
During this period the Regulations for Industrial
Policy, 1948 has been brought into existence. During this phase the foreign
capital was allowed to promote rapid industrialization, careful regulations of
the conditions of foreign capital inflow to protect national interests, and
majority interests in the ownership and effective control should always been in
Indian hands.
B.PHASE TWO; PHASE OF SELECTIVE OPENING
UP (1969-1991):
The period brought two regulations such as
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, 1969 and FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION ACT (FERA), 1973. The MRTP ACT brought in restrictions on the size of
operations, pricing of products and services of foreign companies. FERA limited
the extent of foreign equity to 40%, with the exception of 74% for technology-intensive, export-intensive
and core sector industries.
C.PHASE THREE;
PHASE OF LIBERALIZATION (1991-2000):
The Regulations of Industrial Policy 1991 and
Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) 1999
came into existence in this phase. In 1991 FDI up to 51% was allowed in the Automatic
Route in 35 high priority industries requiring large investments and advanced
technology.
In
1996 the automatic approval route for FDI was expanded, from 35 to 111
industries, under four distinct
categories such as Part-A up to 50%, Part-B up to 51%, Part-C up to 74% and
Part- D up to 100%.
Foreign Investment Promotion Board
(FIPB) was continued for processing FDI proposals.
D.PHASE FOUR; GLOBALIZATION PHASE (2000-2014):
This phase has not brought any codified law and
regulations rather the phase concentrate on the consolidated documentation. In
2000 except for a small negative list, all activities were placed under
automatic route. Insurance and
defence sectors were opened with a cap of 26%.
Telecom cap were increased from 49% to 74% in
2005. FDI up to 51% in single
brand retail was allowed in 2006. Consolidation of existing FDI regulations to
a single document for case of reference.
E. PHASE FIVE; RADICAL
LIBERALIZATION (2014- Till Date):
This phase brought the Make in India Consolidated
FDI Policy 2016. This policy regulation provided certain rules in the field of
FDI, such as, FDI in pharma sector up to 74% in automatic route and beyond that
in the government route.
In
defense, foreign investment beyond 49% has been permitted through the
government approval route, and 100% FDI in
existing airport projects has been allowed in automatic route.
5. AN OVERVIEW OF INSURANCE
SECTOR IN INDIA:
Insurance in India is listed in the Constitution of
India in the Seventh Schedule as a Union List subject, meaning it can only be
legislated by the Central government. The history of insurance date backs to
1818, when Oriental Life Insurance Company was started. In 1870, Bombay Mutual Life Assurance Society became the first
Indian insurer. In the year 1912, the Life Insurance Companies Act and the
Provident Fund Act was passed to regulate the insurance business. This was the
first statutory measure to regulate life insurance business. In 1928, the
Indian collect statistical information about both life and non-life business
transacted in India by Indian and foreign insurers including provident
insurance societies. In 1938, with a view to protecting the interest of the
Insurance public, the earlier legislation was consolidated and amended by the
Insurance Act, 1938 with comprehensive provisions for effective control over the activities of insurers. The Government
of India issued an Ordinance on 19 January 1956 nationalizing the Life Insurance sector and Life
Insurance Corporation came into existence
in the same year. The Life
Insurance Corporation (LIC) absorbed 154 Indian, 16 non-Indian insurers
as
also
75 provident societies—245 Indian and foreign insurers in all. In 1972 the
parliament passed General Insurance
Business (Nationalization) Act, and consequently, General Insurance business
was nationalized with effect from 1 January 1973 [6]. 107 insurers were
amalgamated and grouped into four companies, namely National Insurance Company
Ltd., the New India Assurance Company Ltd., the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd
and the United India Insurance Company Ltd. The General Insurance Corporation
of India was incorporated as a company in 1971 and it commence business on 1
January 1973.
In
1993, the Government set up a committee under the chairmanship of RN Malhotra,
former Governor of RBI, to propose recommendations for reforms in the insurance
sector. Following the recommendations
of the Malhotra Committee report, in 1999, the Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority (IRDA) was constituted as an autonomous body to regulate
and develop the insurance industry. The IRDA was incorporated as a statutory
body in April, 2000. The key objectives of the IRDA include promotion of
competition so as to enhance customer satisfaction through increased consumer
choice and lower premiums, while ensuring the financial security of the
insurance market.
The
IRDA opened up the market in August 2000 with the invitation for application
for registrations. Foreign companies were allowed ownership of up to 26%. The
Authority has the power to frame regulations under Section 114A of the
Insurance Act, 1938 and has from 2000 onwards framed various regulations
ranging from registration of companies for carrying on insurance business to
protection of policyholders’ interests.
The
LIC had monopoly till the late 90s when the Insurance sector was reopened to
the private sector. Before that, the industry consisted of only two state
insurers: Life Insurers (Life Insurance
Corporation
6. FDI POLICY FRAMEWORK IN INDIA :
A foreign direct investment (FDI) is a controlling
ownership in a business enterprise in one country by an entity based in another
country. Apart from being a critical driver of economic growth, foreign direct
investment (FDI) is a major source of non-debt financial resource for the
economic development of India. Foreign companies invest in India to take
advantage of cheaper wages, special investment privileges like tax exemptions,
etc. For a country where foreign investments are being made, it also means achieving
technical know-how and generation of employment.Policy regime is one of the key factors driving investment flows to
a country. Apart from underlying macro fundamentals, ability of a nation
to attract foreign investment essentially depends upon its policy regime -
whether it promotes or restrains the foreign investment flows. There has been a
sea change in India’s approach to foreign investment from the early 1990s when it began structural economic reforms
encompassing almost all the sectors of the economy.
6.1. Pre-Liberalisation Period:
Historically,
India had followed an extremely cautious and selective approach while
formulating FDI policy in view of the dominance of „import-substitution
strategy‟
of industrialization. With the objective of becoming „self
reliant‟,
there was a dual nature of policy intention –
FDI through foreign collaboration was
welcomed in the areas of high technology and high priorities to build national capability and
discouraged in low technology areas to protect and nurture domestic industries.
The regulatory framework was consolidated through the enactment of Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973 wherein foreign equity holding in a joint venture was allowed only up to 40 per
cent. Subsequently, various exemptions were extended to foreign companies
engaged in export oriented businesses and high technology and high priority
areas including allowing equity holdings of over 40 per cent.
6.2. Post-Liberalisation Period:
A major shift occurred when India embarked upon economic liberalization and reforms program in 1991 aiming to raise its growth potential and integrating with the world economy. Industrial policy reforms gradually removed restrictions on investment projects and business expansion on the one hand and allowed increased access to foreign technology and funding on the other. A series of measures that were directed towards liberalizing foreign investment included:
(i) introduction of dual route of approval of FDI – RBI‟s automatic route and
Government’s
approval (SIA/FIPB) route, (ii) automatic permission for technology agreements
in high priority industries and removal of restriction of FDI in low technology areas as well as liberalisation of technology imports,
(iii) permission to Non-resident Indians (NRIs) and
Overseas Corporate Bodies (OCBs) to
invest up to 100 per cent in high priorities sectors,
(iv) hike in the foreign equity participation limits
to 51 per cent for existing companies and liberalization of the use of foreign
„brands name‟
and
(v) signing the Convention of Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) for protection of foreign investments.
These efforts were boosted by the enactment of Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 [that replaced the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973] which was less stringent. This along with the sequential financial sector reforms paved way for greater capital account liberalization in India.
7.
GUIDELINES FOR FDI IN INDIAN INSURANCE
COMPANY:
The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act 2015 introduced
some much awaited reforms, including, increasing the foreign investment cap in
the insurance sector to 49 percent, permitting overseas reinsurers to open
branch offices to carry out reinsurance business in India, etc. The Insurance
Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 also provides for “Indian Owned and controlled”
requirement for an Indian Insurance Company. The Insurance Laws (Amendment)
Act, 2015 defines Indian insurance company under Section 2(7A) as under:
“Indian insurance company” means any insurer, being
a company which is limited by shares, and, ( a) Which is formed and registered under the companies Act, 2013 as a public
company or is converted into such a company within one year of the commencement
of Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015; (b) In which the aggregate holdings of
equity shares by foreign investors, including portfolio investors, do not
exceed forty nine per cent of the paid up equity capital of such Indian
insurance company, which is Indian owned and controlled, in such manner as may be prescribed. Explanation – For the purpose of this sub clause, the expression
“control” shall include the right to appoint a
majority of the directors or to control the management or policy decisions
including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders
agreement or voting agreements (c) Whose sole purpose is to carry on life
insurance business or general insurance business or reinsurance business or
health insurance business. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause
(aaa) of subsection (2) of section 114 of the Insurance Act, 1938 read with
clause (b) of subsection (7A) of section 2 of the Insurance Act, 1938 and section 24 of the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central
Government has notified the Indian Insurance Companies (Foreign Investment)
Rules, 2015. These Rules mainly govern Indian control of Indian Insurance
Company, Indian ownership and issues relating to foreign investment. The
definition of “Indian ownership” has since been amended by Indian Insurance
Companies (Foreign Investment) Amendment Rules, 2015.
As per the above definition, control can be exercised by the virtue
of
(a)Share
holding or
(b)Management
rights or
(c)Shareholders
agreements or
(d)Voting
agreement or
(e)
Any other manner as per applicable laws.
7.1. GUIDELINES OF R.B.I. FOR FOREIGN DIRECT
INVESTMENT:
An Indian company may receive Foreign
Direct Investment under the two routes as given under:
i. Automatic Route:
FDI is allowed
under the automatic route without prior approval either of the Government or
the Reserve Bank of India in all activities/sectors as specified in
the consolidated FDI Policy, issued
by the Government of India from time to time.
ii. Government Route:
FDI in activities not covered under the automatic route requires prior approval of the Government which are considered by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance. Application can be made in Form FCIL. Plain paper applications carrying all relevant details are also accepted. No fee is payable.
An Indian company issuing shares /convertible debentures under FDI Scheme to a person resident outside India shall receive the amount of consideration required to be paid for such shares /convertible debentures by:
(i)
Inward remittance through normal banking channels.
(ii) Debit to NRE / FCNR
account of a person concerned maintained with an AD category I bank.
(iii)
Conversion of royalty /
lump sum / technical know how fee due for payment or conversion of ECB, shall
be treated as consideration for issue of shares.
(iv) Conversion of import
payables / pre incorporation expenses / share swap can be treated as
consideration for issue of shares with the approval of FIPB.
(v) Debit to non-interest
bearing Escrow account in Indian Rupees in India which is opened with the
approval from AD Category – I bank and is maintained with the AD Category I
bank on behalf of residents and non-residents towards payment of share purchase
consideration.
If the shares or convertible debentures are not
issued within 180 days from the date of receipt of the inward remittance or
date of debit to NRE / FCNR (B) / Escrow account, the amount shall be refunded.
Further, Reserve Bank may on an application made to it and for sufficient
reasons permit an Indian Company to refund / allot shares for the amount of
consideration received towards issue of security if such amount is outstanding
beyond the period of 180 days from the date of receipt.
8. PROHIBITION OF FDI IN INDIA:
Though FDI is considered as the best Option for long term development, our Government has not allowed FDI haphazardly in each and every Sector. Government has not allowed FDI in those sectors which are not desired for the rational growth of the society and which may invoke to undertake illegal activities, in sectors which are not in the national interest. FDI restrictions have also been imposed in order to allow the domestic companies to make more profits with less competition, than that of in the presence of rivalry international firms.
Thus, it is clear from the government policies that
FDI is not allowed in activities like gambling, casinos, business of chit hinds, Nidhi Company.
At the same time, atomic energy sector is also not welcomed for FDI in order to
protect the security and sovereignty of
our country. In case of defense sector,
Govemment has allowed
26 per cent FDI, in order to initiate investment process,
but the stake and permission is restricted and depends on state of art so far. It is also well understood that agriculture is the backbone
of our economy so to protect
the livelihood of our half of the citizens who depend on agriculture;
government has not allowed FDI in
actual farming and cultivation
process. But to boost the
agricultural exports, FDI in agro processing
industries is allowed. Therefore regulatory authorities such as RBI, DIPP, and SIA have allowed
FDI, taken into account the various repercussions on our economy as a whole.
The various Indian Sectors having restrictions
of FDI are given below:
Foreign investment in any form is
prohibited in a or a partnership firm or a proprietary concern or any entity,
whether incorporated or not (such as trusts) which is engaged or proposes to
engage in the following activities:
a.
Business of Chit fund, or
b.
Nidhi company
c.
Agriculture or plantation activities, or
d.
Real estate business. or construction of farm
houses, or
e.
Atomic energy
f.
Lottery business
including government/private lottery, online lotteries etc.
g.
Gambling and betting including casinos
h.
Activities and sectors not opened
to private sector investments
i. Agriculture (excluding floriculture. Horticulture, development of seeds, animal husbandry, pisciculture and cultivation of vegetables, mushrooms etc. under controlled conditions and services related to agro and allied sectors) and plantation (other than tea plantation).
9. ROLE OF FDI IN INSURANCE BUSINESS
IN INDIA:
Even
after the liberalization of the insurance sector, the public sector insurance
companies have continued to dominate the insurance market, enjoying over 90% of
the market share. FDI in insurance would increase the penetration of insurance
in India. FDI can meet India’s long term capital requirements to found the
building of infrastructure.
Insurance sector has the capability of raising long term capital from the
masses.. An increase in FDI in insurance would indirectly help the Indian
economy. The role of FDI in the present world is noteworthy. It acts as the
life blood in the growth of the developing countries. The wave of
liberalization, privatization and liberalization sweeping across the world has
opened many national markets for international players. IRDA is in favour of an
increase in foreign investment. India as the most promising, emerging insurance
market in the world. The public sector insurance companies have continued to
dominate in the insurance market.
Beside this the FDI
plays the following important role in the Insurance
Business in India:
i. FDI increases investment level and their by income and employment.
ii.
FDI increases tax income of the
government.
iii.
It facilitates transfer of technology.
iv. FDI encourage
managerial revolution through
professional management.
v.
It increase exports
and reduce import requirements.
vi.
FDI increase
competition and breakdown domestic monopolies.
vii.
It improves quality
and reduces cost of
inputs.
viii. Increase in wide and innovative insurance products and services in India.
ix.
Better competitive market.
x. Better exposure
of technology and other services from foreign partner.
xi.
Increase in insurance penetration and density.
xii.
Increase in employment opportunities.
The measure of insurance penetration and density reflects the level of development of insurance sector in a country. While insurance penetration is measured as the percentage of insurance premium to GDP, insurance density is calculated as the ratio of premium to population (per capita premium).
10. DRAWBACKS OF FDI IN INSURANCE BUSINESS:
In spite of the various benefits of the FDI in Indian Insurance Business the FDI also has many
drawbacks in Indian Insurance Sector, such as the following:
- Cost of production: Encouraged by lower costs of production like raw material, labour etc.
- Economic conditions: Market potential, infrastructure, size of population, income level etc.
- Government policies: Policies like foreign investment, foreign collaboration, remittances, profits, taxation, foreign exchange control, tariffs etc.
- Political factors: Political stability, nature of important political parties and relation with other countries.
- Possibility of rise in unethical practices due to less control of government of India over Insurance sector.
- Higher mobilization of Indian Saving amount to foreign countries.
- Threat to public sector companies’ market share due to increasing number of private life insurance players.
- Products and services offered may not fulfill Indian customer’s expectations.
11.
QUANTAM OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT UNDER INDIAN
INSURANCE COMPANIES ( FOREIGN INVESTMENT) RULES 2015:
In
exercise of the powers conferred by clause (aaa) of sub-section(2) of section
114 of the Insurance Act 1938 read with clause (b) of Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority Act, 1999, the
central government hereby makes the following rules in respect of quantum of
Foreign Direct Investment(FDI) under the Rules 3 to 10 of Indian Insurance
Companies(Foreign Investment) Rules 2015:
I.
No Indian insurance
company shall allow the aggregate holdings by way of total foreign investment
in its equity shares by Foreign Investors, including portfolio investors, to
exceed 49% of the paid up equity capital of such Indian insurance company.
II.
An Indian insurance
company shall ensure that its ownership and control shall remain at all times
in the hands of resident Indian entities referred to in clauses (k) and (l) of
Rule 2.
III.
The Foreign Direct
Investment proposals up to 26% of the total paid up equity of the Indian
insurance company shall be allowed on the automatic route.
IV.
Foreign Direct
Investment proposals which take the total Foreign Investment in the Indian
Insurance Company up 26% and up to the cap of 49% shall be on the FIPB route,
and shall require FIPB approval subject to compliance of the provisions of the Act.
V.
Foreign Portfolio
Investment in an Indian Insurance Company shall be governed by the provisions
contained in sub-regulations (2), (2-A),(3) and (8) of Regulations 5 of FEMA
Regulations, 2000 and provisions of the Securities Exchange Board of India
(Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations.
VI.
Any increase of foreign
investment of an Indian Insurance Company shall be in accordance with the
pricing guidelines specified by Reserve Bank of India under the FEMA.
VII.
The foreign equity
investment cap of 49% shall apply on the same terms as above to Insurance
Brokers, Third Party Administrators, Surveyors and Loss Assessors and other
insurance intermediaries appointed under the provisions of the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority Act 1999:
Provided that where an entity like a bank, whose
primary business is outside the insurance area, is allowed by the Authority to function as an insurance
intermediary, the foreign equity investment caps applicable in that sector
shall continue to apply, subject to the condition that the revenues of such
entities from their primary(i.e., non-insurance related) business must remain
above 50% of their total revenue in any financial year.
VIII.
Other aspects related
to or associated with or flowing from matters related to Foreign Investment in an
Indian Insurance Company, which are not
the subject matter of these
rules, and fall within the regulatory ambit of the Authority, will be regulated
as per regulations to be framed by the Authority, consistent with the relevant
statutes and other rules framed thereunder.
12.
INCREASE OF FDI BY INTRODUCING LATEST AMENDMENT:
Parliament
on March 22 passed the Insurance Amendment Bill 2021 to increase the foreign direct investment (FDI) limit in the
insurance sector to 74% from 49%. This measure was first announced by finance
minister, Nirmala Sitharaman in the Union budget last month.
“Total
Foreign Investment" in an Indian Insurance Company, shall mean the sum
total of direct and indirect foreign
investment by Foreign Investors in such company,
calculated in such manner as is specified in regulations made
by the authority with regard to registration of Indian Insurance Companies," according to Gazette.
It
also mentioned that every Indian insurance company having foreign investment,
existing on or before the date of commencement of the Indian Insurance
Companies (Foreign Investment) Amendment Rules, 2021, shall within one year
from such commencement, comply with the requirements of the provisions.
Any
Indian insurance company with foreign investment exceeding 49% should have half
of its board of directors as independent directors “unless the chairperson of
its board is an independent director, in which case at least one-third of its
board shall comprise of independent directors."
The
proposal to increase foreign investment is likely to help local private
insurers grow fast and expand their presence across India, which has one of the
lowest insurance penetration levels globally.
Insurance
penetration in India is currently at 3.7% of the gross domestic product (GDP) compared to the world average of 6.31%.
Growth in the life insurance sector has slowed to 11- 12% currently from 15-20%
until fiscal 2020, as the pandemic pushed customers to save cash instead of
spending on stocks or life insurance policies.
13.
CONCLUSION:
At
last we can say that there are good chances that increase in F.D.I. will
improve the Insurance penetration and density. Along with that innovative insurance product and
services, better use of technology, increase in employment and competition etc.
are by-product of increase in F.D.I. in insurance Sector. Government of India
through Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India. and Reserve
Bank of India need to keep regular
check on the outflow of India currency. The reforms have changed the whole scenario
of Indian insurance industry. Its character has changed altogether in the wake
of transition from a controlled to a competition- driven market. Several new
players have entered into the insurance business. The foreign insurers have
entered through the joint venture route. Their entry into the field has
generated a tough competition in the market which resulted into better customer
service. The quality and price of insurance products has greatly improved. The
range of products and services has increased so as to give a wider choice to
the customers. There is no doubt that the government monopoly over the
insurance business had to end. There is crying need for better service, more
innovation and a comprehensive insurance cover. The obvious changes in the
insurance market are there for all to see in new brands, new products, fresh
advertising and smart agents-all adding
up to the excitement.
No comments:
Post a Comment