Sunday, June 2, 2024

The Governor – eligibility, appointments, powers, rules and responsibilities; and discretions

The Governor – eligibility, appointments, powers, rules and responsibilities; and discretions

In this article we have made a comprehensive study on Governor – appointments, eligibility, powers, rules and responsibilities, and discretions

 

Introduction

 

In the intricate tapestry of India's governance, the role of Governors stands as a crucial element in the federal structure envisioned by the framers of the Constitution. Instituted as the constitutional heads of states, Governors play a pivotal role in maintaining the delicate balance between the Union and its constituent units. Their powers and responsibilities, as enshrined in the Constitution of India, reflect a nuanced blend of ceremonial duties and constitutional prerogatives aimed at fostering cooperative federalism while upholding democratic principles.

 

Constitutional foundation

 

The executive authority of state is vested in the Governor of the State who exercise directly or through the officer’s subordinate to him Article 153 to 160 deal with the office of the Governor

 

Article 153: (Governor State) –

 

There shall be a Governor for each State. The same person may sometimes be appointed as Governor of two or more States (added by 7th Amendment). The Governor is appointed by the President (Article 155). The prescribed term of office of a Governor is five years, but he holds office at the pleasure of the President (Article 156). The pleasure of President is not justiciable. The Governor has no security of tenure. He may be removed by the President at any time. No person can be appointed as Governor unless he is a citizen of India and has completed the age of 35 years (Article 157). He must not be member of either house of the legislature of any State specified in the first schedule of the constitution. If a member of the legislature is appointed as Governor, he shall be deemed to have vacated his seat. He shall not hold any other office of profit. His salary has been fixed by the Constitution but can be varied by the Union Parliament. However, the emoluments and allowances of the Governor cannot be diminished during his term of office. The Governor is entitled without payment of rent to the use of his official residence and is also entitled to various other allowances and privileges (Article 158). Every Governor and every person discharging the function of the Governor shall before entering upon his office, make and subscribe in the presence of the Chief Justice of the State High Court or in his absence, the senior-most judge of that court available an oath or affirmation in the form given under Article 159.

 

Constitutional Position of the Governor:

 

The constitutional position of the Governor in relation to the legislature and administration is the same as that of the Union President. Under Article 156, the Governor holds office during the pleasure of the President and therefore, owes his appointment to the President and continues to hold his office at the discretion of the President. In this respect he occupies the position of a representative of the Union in the States. However, Article 163(1) states that there shall be a council of Minister with the Chief Minister at the head to aid and advice the Governor in the exercise of his functions, except in so far as he is by or under this constitution required to exercise his functions or any of them in his discretion.

 

Article 163(2) states that if any question arises whether any matter is or is not a matter as respects which the Governor is by or under the constitution required to act in his discretion, the decision of the Governor shall be final and the validity of his decision is not open to question in a court of law. Under the Constitution where the expression “in his discretion” is used in relation to the powers and functions of the Governor the reference is to special responsibilities of the Governor, such as Article 371-A (1) (b) and (d) and 2(b) & (f) and paragraph 9(2) and 18(3) in the sixth schedule


Article 239(2) also states that where a Governor is appointed as an administrator of an adjoining Union Territory, he shall exercise his functions as such administrator independent by of his council of Ministers. Besides, it a reference may be made to Article 356 and 200. In making a report under Article 356, the Governor will be justified in exercising his discretion even against the aid and advice of his council of Ministers. The reason is that the failure of the Constitutional Machinery may be because of the conduct of the council of Ministers. Similarly, Article 200 indicates another instance where the Governor may act in reserving a Bill for the consideration of the President irrespective of any advice from the council of Ministers. In such matters the Governor has to discharge his duties to the best of his judgement and pursue such course, which is not detrimental to the state. Moreover, being an appointee of the President and holding his office during his pleasure the Governor in the exercise of his discretion may be guided by the Union. Except in matter which the Governor is required by or under the constitution to exercise his function in his discretion the Governor is the constitutional of formal head of the state and he exercises all his powers and functions on the aid and on advice of his council of ministers. This is so because our constitution embodies generally the Parliamentary or cabinet system of government of the British Model at the Union and the States. Clause (1) of Article 164 empowers the Governor to appoint the Chief Minister. However, like the discretion of the President in the appointment of the Prime Minister, Governor’s discretion as to appointment of the Chief Minister is conditioned that he should enjoy the majority support however, extraordinary situation may require the Governor to act at his discretion. For instance, inhere is no clear-cut majority of a party or an alliance of parties in the legislative assembly, the Governor may exercise his discretion in the appointment of Chief Minister according to his personal assessment of the situation at that time.

 

Executive Powers of the Governor:

 

All the executive power of the State is vested in the Governor and is to be exercised by him either directly or through officer’s subordinate to him in accordance with the constitution. He appoints the Chief Ministers. According to the convention he can appoint only such person to the post about whom he feels would be able to command the confidence of the majority of members of the Legislative Assembly. The well-established convention is that he calls the leader of the majority party or an alliance to form the Ministry. He appoints other Ministers and distributes portfolios amongst them on the advice of the Chief Minister. Besides, he also appoints Advocate-General, Chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission. All the executive action of the state is required to be taken in the name of the Governor. The Governor makes rules for the more convenient transaction of business of the State and for allocation of work among the Ministers. A decision of the council of Minister does not become operative as the Governor's name and duly authentication in accordance with the rules made by the Governor is required.

 

Extent of Executive power of State: Article 152

 

This article defines the extent of the executive powers of a State. This article does not define legitimately what comes within its scope. They are concerned primarily with the distribution of the executive power between the Union and States. Ordinarily executive functions mean residue of governmental functions that remain after legislative and judicial functions are taken away. The executive function comprises of both the determination of policy as well as carrying it into execution. Power of state extends to matters with respect to which the legislature of a state has authority to make laws, i.e. the subjects enumerated in the state list and the concurrent list. But in relation to the subjects enumerated in the concurrent list the executive power of the state is subject to the executive power expressly conferred by the constitution or by any law made by Parliament, upon the union or the authorities thereof. Thus, where parliament by law confer duty of executing a law upon union authorities then the executive power of state on that subject be deemed to be abrogated.

 

Similarly, where the legislative power of the state is subjected to the legislative power of the union as for example, the power of the state legislature in Entry 23 of list II is subject to the power of Parliament in Entry 54 in list I, and the union exercise its legislative power and confers executive power on its officials then the legislative power of the state is denuded to that extent and so also the execution by the State in such a case will be unconstitutional. A limit fixed by Article 162, however, is extensible. The provisions of Article 258(2) afford a means of such extension. But the limit is extensible at the instance of the Union Parliament alone. The state legislature cannot on its own accord, undertake the execution of the matters falling within the exclusive authority of the Union.

 

Legislative Powers of Governor:

 

As Governor is an inseparable part of the legislature, he possesses certain legislative powers. Under Article 171(3) (c) and (5), the Governor may nominate to the legislative council of the state-where it exists one-sixth members from among persons having special knowledge or practical experience in respect of literature, science, art, cooperative movement and social service. He may also nominate to the legislative Assembly a person from the Anglo-Indian Community, if he feels the community needs representation and is not adequately represented in the Assembly (Article 333). Under Article 168, the Governor is a part of the legislature of the state. He summons and prorogues the two houses of the legislature (in case of bicameral legislature) and can dissolve the legislative Assembly of the state (article 174). He may address the members of the legislature and may send messages (Article 175-176). Without the Governor's assent, no Bill car become law even after its being passed by the two houses (article 200). After a Billis passed by the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council, if any, it is presented to the Governor, presumably with the advice of the council of ministers for his assent to the Bill as passed. The Governor may

 

i. give his assent to the bill

 

ii. With hold his assent

 

iii. Reserve the bill for the consideration of president

 

iv. Except is case of a money bill, return the bill for reconsideration with his message as soon as possible

 

There is a fifth possibility which is often not mentioned, viz that of returning the bill to the government seeking certain clarifications or information in regard to the Bill and in effect suggesting is regard to the Bill advice earlier given by the Council of Ministers for assenting to the Bill (article 167). If a Bill is returned by the Governor to the legislature with a message it will be considered accordingly and if passed again with or without amendments, it will be assented to except when the Bill is returned to the Government or reserved for consideration of the President, the Governor may be said to be acting only on the advice of the council of ministers in either of the four options. In any case, the exercise of Govern Governor's power in this regard cannot be questioned in a court of law. In law the Governor can refuse to give his assent to a Bill, i.e., he can veto a Bill. If he does so, the Bill cannot become an Act But in the form of Government set up under the constitution it would be politically impossible for a Governor to refuse his assent to a Bill, after it has been passed by the legislature, because he acts in this matter, on the advice of his cabinet and no bill could be passed by both house if opposed by the cabinet.

 

However, the power vested in the Governor to reserve a bill for the consideration of the President is discretionary. In his discretion whether, the Bill should be reserved for the consideration of President and in this respect the Governor becomes an important link Between the Union and the states thereby enabling the Union to some control over the legislative activities the lates exercise Once a Bill is reserved for the consideration of the President and the President assents to it, it becomes an Act and nobody can question its validity on the ground that it was not necessary to reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President.

 

Article 174(2) which enables the Governor to prorogue the legislature does not indicate any restriction on this power. This article does not indicate the manner which the Governor is to make his orders.

 

In K.A. Mathialagas, V Governo (AIR 1973 Mad 198) a question arose whether the Governor in exercise of his powers under Artiste 174 (2)(a) should act on his discretion or on the advice of the council of Ministers. The Madras High Court held that the Governor was bound by the advice of the council of Ministers in the matter of prorogation. The Governor by virtue of Article 164(1), has discretion to dismiss ministers, but that power is very different from the one to prorogue the legislative Assembly under Article 174(2)(a).

 

Ordinance Making Power:

 

Article 213: Power of Governor to promulgate ordinance during recess of legislature.

 

The ordinance making power of the state Governors, subject to certain additional limitations, is similar to that of the President under Article 123.

 

The Governor can issue ordinance only when two conditions are fulfilled:

 

1) The Governor can only issue ordinances when the Legislative assembly of a state is not in session or where there are two houses in a state both houses are not in session.

 

2) The Governor must be satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take necessary action. The court cannot question the validity of the ordinance on the ground that there was no necessity or sufficient ground for issuing the ordinance by the Governor. The existence of such necessity is not a justiciable issue. The exercise of ordinance making power is not discretionary. The Governor exercises this power on the advice of the Cabinet.

 

The Governor, however, cannot promulgate an ordinance without instruction from the President if:

 

(i) A bill containing the same provision would have required previous sanction of the President for the Introduction thereof into the state legislature.

 

(ii) The Governor would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President or

 

(iii) an act of the state legislature containing the same provisions would be invalid unless having been reserved for the consideration of the President It had received his assent.

 

Financial Power:

 

Under Article 202, the Governor is required to cause to be laid before the House or houses of the legislature the budget or the Annual Financial Statement. A money bill cannot be introduced or moved in the legislative Assembly except on the recommendation of the Governor. A Bill involving expenditure from the consolidated fund of the state cannot be passed by the legislature unless the Governor has recommended for its consideration. No demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the Governor.

 

Pardoning Power: (Article 161)

 

The corresponding provision relating to the mercy jurisdiction of the president is enacted in Article 72. Under Article 101 the Governor has the power to grant pardons, etc, to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence against any law “relating to a matter, to which the executive power of the state extends”. The executive power of the State extends to matter with respect to which the legislature of the state has power to make laws. The power, of course, has to be exercised on the advice of the council of Minister. Article 72 can be reconciled with Article 161 by limiting the power of the Governor to grant pardons to cases not covered by article 72. The power of the Governor to grant pardons, reprieves and respites in all cases where the sentences of death and to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person is coextensive with the executive power of the state.

In K.M. Nanawati Vs State of Bombay (AIR 1961 SC 99); The supreme Court held that it is open to the Governor to grant a full pardon at any time even during the pendency of the case in the Supreme Court but the Governor cannot so exercise his power of suspension of the sentences for the period when the Supreme Court is seized of the case. The Governor's power of suspension was held to be subject to the rules framed by the Supreme Court.

 

Discretionary function of the Governor

 

Article 163 expressly recognized that there are areas in which the Governor has to act without the aid and advise of the Council of Ministers.

 

There are two types of situations in which the Governor is expected to use his discretion

 

(a) Those which are implied by the nature of Parliamentary democracy and the Constitution.

 

(b) Those where the Constitution has expressly imposed special responsibility on the Governor.

 

Implied by the Constitution:

 

The first type of situation covers the following:

 

(1) Choice of Chief Minister.

 

(2) Asking the Government to prove its strength in the Assembly.

 

(3) Dismissing a Chief Minister.

 

(4) Dissolving the legislative assembly.

 

(5) Recommending President's Rule (Art. 356)

 

(6) Reserving Bills for consideration of the President (Art. (200)

 

(7) Returning a Bill for reconsideration (Art. 200).

 

The discretion vested in the Governor is to be exercised by him in a fair and non-partisan manner. It should be aimed to protect and preserve the Constitution and its ideals and institutions. To further the interest of a party, a group or an individual should be farthest from his mind. It is a discretion vested in a Constitutional head of a State and he is expected to exercise it in a prudent and responsible manner. The power is coupled with a duty. It is not an unbridled power of a despot who functions according to his whims and fancy. It is the power to protect, not the bower to destroy the Constitution and the legacy or responsible government.

 

Expressly Conferred by the Constitution:

 

Under the 2nd category are discretionary powers conferred by the specific articles of the Constitution. They are referred to in the various article as special responsibility

 

(1) Article 371(2) - special responsibility of the Governor of Maharashtra and Gujarat (if so directed by the President) for the establishment of development board for Vidarbha, Marathwada, Saurashtra and Kutch etc.

 

(2) Article 371A - Special responsibility of the Governor of Nagaland.

 

(i) with respect to law and order so long as internal disturbances occur in some area of that state.

 

(ii) to establish a regional council for Tuensang district.

 

(iii) to arrange for equitable allocation of money between Tuensang district and the rest of Nagaland.

 

(3) Article 371C (1) Special responsibility of the Governor of Manipur to secure the power functioning of a committee of the member of the Legislative Assembly consisting of the members representing the hilly areas.

 

(4) Article 371F (g) Special responsibility of the Governor of Sikkim for the peace and for an equitable arrangement for ensuring the advancement of different sections of the population of Sikkim.

 

(5) Article 371H (a) - Special responsibility of the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh with respect to law and order.

 

In discharge of these functions, the Governor concerned is not bound to seek or accept the advice of his Council of Minister.

 

Conclusion:

 

In the intricate web of India's federal polity, Governors emerge as the custodians of constitutional values, tasked with the onerous responsibility of upholding the principles of democracy, federalism, and good governance. As the nation strides forward on its path of progress and development, the role of Governors remains indispensable in fostering cooperative federalism and ensuring that the spirit of the Constitution permeates every aspect of governance at the state level. Thus, while the powers and functions of Governors may evolve with time, their enduring commitment to constitutional principles remains unwavering, serving as a beacon of hope for a vibrant and resilient democracy.

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

 

1. What does Article 153 of the Indian Constitution establish?

 

  • Article 153 establishes the office of the Governor as the constitutional head of a state in India.

 

2. Under Article 154, what are the executive powers of the Governor?

 

  • Article 154 grants the Governor the executive powers of the state, which they exercise with the assistance and advice of the Council of Ministers.

 

3. What does Article 155 specify regarding the term of office of the Governor?

 

  • Article 155 states that the Governor shall hold office for a term of five years, but this term can be terminated earlier under specific circumstances.

 

4. Under Article 156, who has the power to remove a Governor?

 

  • Article 156 grants the President of India the power to remove a Governor from office.

 

5. What does Article 157 address regarding the eligibility criteria for the Governor's office?

 

  • Article 157 specifies that a person shall not be eligible for appointment as Governor unless they are a citizen of India and have completed the age of 35 years.

 

6. What are the Governor's legislative powers as outlined in Article 158?

 

  • Article 158 grants the Governor the power to summon and prorogue the state legislature and to dissolve the state legislative assembly.

 

7. Under Article 159, what happens if the office of the Governor falls vacant?

 

  • Article 159 provides for the discharge of the functions of the Governor by the Deputy Governor, if appointed, or by another person designated by the President.

 

8. What is the significance of Article 160 in the Indian Constitution?

 

  • Article 160 empowers the President to appoint a Governor to discharge the functions of the Governor of another state in the absence of the Governor or when the office is vacant.

 

9. What does Article 161 address regarding the power of the Governor to grant pardons?

 

  • Article 161 grants the Governor the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offense against the law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the state extends.

 

10. What does Article 162 specify regarding the extent of executive power of the state?


  • Article 162 states that the executive power of the state shall extend to all matters in respect of which the state legislature has the power to make laws.

 

11. What is the role of the Governor in appointing the Chief Minister?

 

  • The Governor appoints the Chief Minister and other members of the Council of Ministers.

 

12. How does the Governor act as a link between the Union and the states?

 

  • Governors foster cooperation and coordination between the center and the states, promoting harmony and resolving disputes.

 

13. What challenges have Governors faced in India?

 

  • Governors have faced controversies over issues like political interference and partisan behavior, raising questions about their neutrality and efficacy.

 

14. What is the significance of transparency and accountability in the appointment process of Governors?

 

  • Transparency and accountability are crucial to ensure that individuals appointed as Governors possess the requisite credentials and uphold the highest standards of integrity.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment