Monday, June 26, 2023

CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF INDIA: PART - II

CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF INDIA: PART - II

Part II of the article (followed by Part I) will be discussing about the Introduction of Self-Government and Framing of New Constitution.

 

D. INTRODUCTION OF SELF-GOVERNMENT (1919 – 1947):

 

1. The Government of India Act, 1919-Montegu-Chelmsford Report:

 

The next landmark on the Constitutional development of India was the Montagu Chelmsford Report which led to the enactment of the Government of India Act, 1919. The Morley-Minto Reforms failed to satisfy the aspirations of the Indians as they did not establish Parliamentary system of Government in the country.

 

2. Main feature of the 1919 Act:

 

i) The Declaration – It promised a responsible Government to the Indians.

 

ii) Dyarchy in the provinces – The Act introduced a system of Dyarchy in the Provinces and that has been derived from the Greek word ‘di-arche’, means double rule. The object of it was to train the natives in the act of self-government in the matter of legislation subjects were divided into two Central and Provincial. Further the Provincial subjects were divided into ‘Reserved’ and ‘Transfer’. More important subjects were Reserved subject and had to be governed by the Governor and his Council. The less important subjects were Transferred subject and given to the Indian Ministers and Governor but the power was limited. Governor-General had the ultimate call over any bill and also had the power to Veto Bills.

 

3. Central Government:

 

The responsible Government did not introduce in the Centre. The Central Government was remained responsible to the British Parliament through the Secretary of State. The Governor-General had overriding powers in respect of Legislature.

 

4. Structure of Government:

 

The Government of India remained a unitary and centralized Government with Governor-General-in-Council as the key-stone of the whole Constitutional edifice. Central Legislature had power to legislate on any matter and was not possible to challenge the validity. In case of controversy over any matter it is the Governor-General-in-Council who had the only authority to decide.

 

Shortcoming of the Act of 1919 –

 

The Reforms of 1919, however, failed to fulfil aspirations of the people of India, which led to an agitation by the Congress for ‘Swaraj’ or ‘Self-Government to be attained through non-co-operation.

 

Simon Commission –

 

The British Government established the Simon Commission as a Statutory Commission in response to the ongoing demand for more reforms. The Government of India Act provided for the appointment of a Statutory Commission to inquire into and report on the working of the Act in 1927 and the Commission submitted its report in 1930. The report was discussed at the Round Table Conference, which included representatives of the British government, British India, and the state rulers. Following the Conference, a white paper was created outlining the reforms, and it was provided to the Select Committee of the Parliament. The Government of India Bill was subsequently introduced in Parliament based on the recommendations of the Select Committee and passed with a few modifications as the Government of India Act, 1935.

 

Government of India Act, 1935:

 

Government of India Act, 1935 brought a tremendous drawback in the Constitutional history of India. It formed the responsible government. The basic feature of the Act was the introduction of partial responsibility at the Centre, Provincial autonomy and an All-India Federation.

 

i. Federation:

 

The Government of India Act, 1935 proposed a federation taking the Provinces and Indian States as one unit. But the accession of the States was optional and at the time of joining ruler of the State needed to sign an Instrument of Accession.

 

ii. Abolition of Dyarchy at Provincial level:

 

The Act of 1935 abolished Dyarchy at Provincial level and introduced it in the Centre. It vested executive authority in the hand of Governor-General and Federal matters was divided into parts, one was ‘Reserved’ and ‘Transferred’ was another.

 

iii. Provincial Autonomy:

 

The Act divided legislative between Provincial legislature and Central legislature and within its defined sphere the Provinces were no longer delegate of Central Government but were autonomous unit of administration.

 

iv. Federal Legislature:

 

The Act provided for legislature consists of two houses, such as Council of States and Legislative Council. Council of States was considered as upper house and Legislative Assembly as lower house. Financial Bills were required to introduced in lower house (Legislative Assembly). The Act of 1935, however, had provided for the joint session of both houses in case of solving deadlock over any bill.

 

v. Provincial Government:

 

The Provincial Executive was consisting of Governor and Council of minister. Governor was to act on advice of the Council of Minister but in case of matters involving his special responsibility he had the right to override the advice of Council.

 

vi. Provincial Legislature:

 

The Provincial legislature had power to made laws on the subjects mentioned in the Provincial list as well as in Concurrent list. No bill could become an Act with the assent of Governor and needed prior sanction of the Governor or Governor-General to introduce the bill. Even Governor could return the bill for reconsideration. Discretionary power and responsibility of the Governor set him as dictator in Provinces.

 

vii. Division of legislative power:

 

The Act made division of legislative power between the Centre and Provinces through three lists such as Federal list, Provincial list and Concurrent list. Federal laws were to prevailed in case of any conflict between Provincial law and Federal law. The Act also provided for the proclamation of Emergency by Governor-General.

 

Federal Court:

 

The Government of India Act, 1935, established a Federal Court and the judges of the court were to appointed by the Crown. The Court was given with the threefold jurisdiction, they were, Original jurisdiction, Appellate jurisdiction and Advisory juris



· Original jurisdiction – in any dispute between the federation and its units inter se.

· Appellate jurisdiction – case involved a substantial question of law as to interpret GOI Act, 1935 could appeal from the judgement of High Court to Federal Court.

· Advisory jurisdiction – Governor could get advice in any matter involved question of law.

 

Cripps Mission:

 

British Government got realized it's time to negotiate with Indians, therefore in March 22, 1942, British Government sent an official in India to negotiate with India (known as Cripps Mission). Following were the proposals for settlement.

 

  i.  Framing a new Constitution of India by an elected body.

ii. Involvement of the Indian States in the Constitution Making Body.

iii. British Government was ready to frame new Constitution if-

ü  Provinces, not ready to accept new Constitution, to retain its present Constitution.

ü  Negotiation between His Majesty’s Government and Constitution Making Body had to be signed.

iv. Constitution Making Body were to compose of members from Provincial legislature and nominated by Indian King.

v. His Majesty’s Government must bear the responsibility of the defence of India.

 

Those proposals basically sent to India to had Indian support in 2nd World War. But the Indians were not satisfied with the proposals and hence, rejected it.

 

Cabinet Mission:

 

On 4th March, 1946 Cabinet Mission came to India with following proposals;

 

      i.        To constitute Union of India embodying British Indian and States.

    ii.        States were to retain all the subjects except certain reserved subjects.

   iii.       Formulate Constituent Assembly of India for the purpose framing new Constitution.

   iv.       The Crown's paramountcy is about to end.

     v.        Set up of interim Government and that got support of major political parties.

 

The proposals of Cabinet Mission were accepted and in July, 1946 first election to Constituent Assembly was held.

 

Indian Independence Act, 1947:

 

The provisions of the Act were as follows: -

 

i. The Act authorized the establishment of two separate Dominions. Pakistan and India since August 15, 1947.


ii. Each Dominion was required to have a Governor-General, who was chosen by the King.


iii. Until the new Constitution took effect, the Constituent Assemblies of both Dominions had the authority to create laws for their respective territories.


iv. The British Government was not to have any control over the Dominion or the Provinces after August 15, 1947.


v. The Government of India Act, 1935 was to be used to govern each of the Dominions and Provinces temporarily, up until the new Constitutions were drafted.


vi. The post of Secretary of the State for India was to be abolished and was taken over by secretary of the Commonwealth Nations.


vii. The Act declared the end of British supremacy over the Indian States.

 

The Indian Independence Act, 1947, came into force on August 15, 1947, when the British rule in India came to an end.

 

E. FRAMING OF NEW CONSTITUTION (1947 – 1950)

 

On 15th August 1947 India got independence and the struggle for independence got over. But it was not the end, it was beginning of struggle to live in a independent nation and at the same time, establish a democracy based on the idea of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity.

 

Constituent Assembly came into force on November 1946 under the Cabinet Mission Plan. It was not a sovereign body because it was formed under Cabinet Mission Plan from the British Government and could be abolish at their will.

 

Indian Independence Act, 1947 led the Constituent Assembly as a sovereign body and was no more subordinate to Cabinet Mission Plan. And it was free to frame constitution.

 

The first meeting of Constituent Assembly was held on 9th December 1946 as the Sovereign Constituent Assembly for India. Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as its permanent chairman on December 11, 1946. The Assembly made substantial progress and adopted and ‘Objective Resolution,’ which late became the Preamble of the Constitution.

 

On 29 August 1947, the Drafting Committee of the Constitution was constituted by the Constituent Assembly with Dr. B. R. Ambedkar as the Chairman of along with six other members assisted by a constitutional advisor.

 

A Draft Constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to the Assembly on 4th November 1947. The draft constitution was debated and 7,635 amendments were proposed and 2,473 were actually discussed. Constituent Assembly held 11 sessions and the Draft Constitution was considered for 114 days. Indeed, Constituent Assembly sat for 2 years 11 months and 18 days.

 

Finally, on 26th November 1949 the new Constitution of India adopted by the Constituent Assembly. 26th January 1950 the Constitution of India came into force.

 

Name of the Constitution:


The name of our Constitution is “The Constitution of India”.

 

The Constitution of India replaced the Indian Independence Act, 1947 and Government of India Act, 1935. And replace Federal Court with Supreme Court of India in 1950.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

Constitutional history of India is prolonged way which has been crossed by the freedom fighters. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar is called as the Father of the Constitution. The Indian Constitution is the lengthiest and the most detailed of all the written constitution in the world. It started the new era of sovereign administration of India.


PART I

No comments:

Post a Comment