What is Contempt of Court?

Contempt of court is a vital legal mechanism in India, designed to preserve the authority and dignity of the judicial process. It ensures that the courts' commands are respected and that the administration of justice is not obstructed or undermined.

​

Definition and Purpose

Contempt of court refers to any act that disrespects, disobeys, or challenges the authority of a court of law. This offence intends to safeguard the integrity, independence, and effective functioning of the judiciary. The law addresses any conduct that hampers the court’s proceedings, undermines its orders, or lowers its authority in the eyes of the public.

​

Constitutional and Legislative Framework

• The Indian Constitution empowers the Supreme Court and High Courts to punish for their own contempt through Articles 129 and 215, respectively.​
• The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, provides the statutory basis for regulating contempt in India, defining its types and procedures for punishment.​

Types of Contempt

• Civil Contempt: Defined as the wilful disobedience of any court judgment, order, or direction, or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a court.​
• Criminal Contempt: Encompasses publications or actions that:
• Scandalise, or tend to scandalise, or lower the authority of any court;
• Prejudice or interfere with the due course of judicial proceedings;
• Obstruct the administration of justice in any manner.​

Punishment for Contempt

The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prescribes a maximum punishment of six months’ imprisonment, a fine up to ₹2,000, or both. However, courts may remit the punishment if a satisfactory apology is made.​

Balancing Contempt with Freedom of Speech

Indian contempt law frequently raises concerns about potentially limiting the right to free speech and criticism of the judiciary. The 2006 amendment to the Contempt of Courts Act allows truth as a defence if the statement is in public interest and is made in a bona fide manner. This is an attempt to safeguard genuine public discourse while protecting the dignity of judicial processes.​

Conclusion

Contempt of court upholds the respect for judicial institutions, ensuring that verdicts are carried out and justice is not derailed by disruptive or disrespectful conduct. However, the application of contempt laws must be balanced carefully with the fundamental right to freedom of expression, upholding both judicial dignity and democratic values.

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

 

Ø What is the punishment for contempt of court?

The punishment can include simple imprisonment for up to six months, a fine of up to Rs. 2000, or both. An apology to the court can potentially waive the punishment.​

 

Ø Who has the power to punish for contempt?

The Supreme Court and High Courts have the authority to punish individuals for contempt of court under Articles 129 and 215 of the Indian Constitution and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.​

 

Ø What are common examples of contempt of court?

Examples include disobedience of court orders, scandalizing or disrespecting the judiciary, damaging court proceedings, and publication of material prejudicial to court proceedings or officials.​

 

Ø Is free speech protected against contempt?

There are defenses available, such as truth and fair comment, especially when remarks are made in the public interest. However, blatant contemptuous behavior or statements that undermine the judiciary can be penalized.​

 

Ø Can a judge himself be accused of contempt?

Yes, even judges can be held liable if they disrespect or undermine the judiciary's authority, though such cases are rare and usually involve extraordinary circumstances (e.g., Justice C.S. Karnan).

 

Ø Can truth be a defense against contempt?

Yes, if the statement is made in the public interest and bona fide, truth can be a defense (since 2006 amendment).​

 

Ø Can contempt take place outside the courtroom?

Yes, contempt can occur inside court, outside court, or even on social media if it disrespects or obstructs the judiciary.​